In Guild Wars 1 the starter armors for warriors were all bare leg. Why didn’t they make at least one of them bare-legged. Look at the first soldier armors you get, they’re so similar. Yeah sure I’m picking armors from 3 campaigns and 1 expansion for GW1, but if GW2 is playing the “no expansion, small updates instead” then I think it’s fair to compare it to the first game.Īnd there are some really easy things they could have done in GW2 to break the monotony. And since paragon would be considered an heavy armor class here, you also get looks for roman centurion stuff. Want to be skimpy? Elite gladiator, skimpy for both genders.
Want to look like a knight? Elite platemail, Elite templar, Elite sunspear. Want to look like a samurai? Luxon armor. Want to look like a total psychopath in dark armor? Core prestige armor, Kurzick armor, Primeval Armor. Look at the first game in comparison: it didn’t matter what gender your character were, you had something for pretty any class stereotype you wanted.
#Skyrim i love cleavage bugs full
I’m pretty sure barbaric shows a lot of torso and muscle on a man too so we’re far from full plate.ĭoesn’t matter though, I can give you that females are probably better off, my point is that the variety is limited for everyone, and on a much larger scale than just which gender is skimpier. Pit Fighter is just as revealing on the males if not more so I don’t see why that one was mentionned. I don’t even know what she’s supposed to be wearing around the waist. I’ll give you that it’s revealing, but it looks silly to me. The female Phalanx armor is an atrocity that doesn’t even look like the original art that was presented (on the male character), and on top of that it cost gems. In fact if you count THAT as revealing, I could make a male norn, give him Pitfighter, look under the kilt and say “there, males have revealing armor.” The first armor is 1) a Vigil-exclusive and so far not even the gem store does allows you to bypass that restriction so that’s not an option for 67% of the warriors/guardians, and 2) it only looks skimpy because of the point of view, you barely see the girl’s legs normally.
0 kommentar(er)
